Is the Bible Ahead of Science

Job 38:16 Hast thou entered into the springs of the sea? or hast thou walked in the search of the depth? Did you know that it is a fact that scientists did not even know that their were springs under the sea until the 20th century.The book of Job was written about 4000 years ago. Did you know that it is a fact that no two snow flakes have ever been found to be the same. All snow flakes are six sided and they have an appearance of design. God and Job knew about it before the scientists knew about it Eccl.1:7 All the rivers run into the sea; yet the sea is not full; unto the place from whence the rivers come, thither they return again. It is a fact that Solomon knew about the Water Cycle over 3000 years ago. The Bible appears to be ahead of science.
Isa. 40:22 It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, Isaiah knew that the Earth was round and anyone reading the Bible before the Dark Ages knew the Earth was round.

It was the Catholic Church that suppressed the truth and made it illegal for the common man to own the Bible. That is what brought us into the Dark Ages. The Catholic Church made part of their doctrinal heresy that the earth was flat. The Christians then were blamed for that teaching. It is a fact that the Catholic church was never a Christian church. It was pagan to the core from the very beginning. Christianity came from Jesus Christ not the Pharisees (Catholic church).

Bible:theology :: Creation:science
(The Bible is to theology as creation is to science)

The diagram distinguishes between: 1) Scripture and theology, and 2) creation and science. Scripture is God’s Word and therefore free from error. The physical creation is God’s work and therefore will never be in conflict with God’s word. However, theology is man’s study of Scripture, just as science is man’s study of creation. As such, theology and science are both susceptible to error and can be in conflict with each other.

Thus when science and theology conflict, we should not rush to judgment about which side is wrong. Rather we should continue to test our theology against the evidence of Scripture and our science against the evidence of the physical world. When we get our theology and science correct, there will be no conflict between the two.

I like this model because it affirms:
1) the truth of God’s word,
2) the order of God’s world, and
3) the value of both theological and scientific endeavor.