



In the 1700’s many scientists believed that life spontaneously generated from non-living matter (such
as raw meat or sewage). In the 1800’s, using careful experimentation, Louis Pasteur proved this
concept wrong and verified that life only comes from previously existing life. Ironically, many
scientists have once again returned to the belief that life came from non-life… in spite of the fact that
there is no experimental evidence to show how that could have happened. The reason this
unsupported belief has returned is that science has been defined to eliminate the consideration of the
only other alternative – the creation of life by an intelligent designer.
Even the simplest living cell is an incredibly complex machine. It must be capable of detecting
malfunctions, repairing itself, and making copies of itself. Man has never succeeded in building a
machine capable of these same functions. Yet most scientists accept the belief that life arose from
non-life (in spite of the evidence clearly indicating that it did not and could not happen). This
incredible belief is as absurd as the finding a complex chemical manufacturing facility on Mars and
assuming that it built itself.
One classic experiment that is used to support the belief that life “built itself”, is an experiment by
Stanley Miller in 1953. In this experiment sparks were discharged into an apparatus, which was
circulating common gases. These gases reacted to form various organic products, which were
collected and analyzed. The experiment succeeded in producing only a few of the 20 amino acids
required by living cells. Yet the results have repeatedly been heralded as evidence that life could have
arisen by itself. Furthermore, the dozens of major problems with this experiment as an explanation for
the formation of life are seldom reported.¹
For instance, our early atmosphere was assumed to have no oxygen because this would stop amino
acid formation. However, with no oxygen, there would be no ozone shield. With no ozone shield, life
would also be impossible. Furthermore, oxidized rocks throughout the geologic record indicate that
oxygen has always been present. In addition to this, the same gases that can react to form amino
acids undergo known reactions in the presence of sunlight, which removes them from the
atmosphere. The required gases would not have been around long enough for life to have developed!
In addition, a cold trap was used to keep the reaction products from being destroyed as fast as they
formed.
The biggest problem is that the amino acids formed in this experiment are always a 50/50 mixture of
stereotypes (L and D forms). Stereotypes are like a drawer full of right-hand and left-hand gloves,
identical in every way except a mirror image of each other. Life contains only L stereotypes of these
randomly produced amino acids. Yet equal proportions of both types are always produced. How
could the first cell have selected only L stereotypes from a random, equally reactive mixture? No
answer to this has ever been found.
These are just a few of the problems with the fanciful idea that life generated itself. The linking of
these randomly produced amino acids into the required proteins is an even more overwhelming
impossibility. No experiment has ever shown that matter has the ability to come alive. The best
explanation for life is still that “life only comes from pre-existing life”. As you search for the truth,
perhaps you should consider the possibility that the source of all life…. Is God.
¹. Thaxton, C.B., Bradley, W.L., Olsen,R.L., The Mystery of Life’s Origin, Chapter 4, Philosophical
Library, 1984.
Amino Acid Synthesis (1953).
When Stanley Miller produced a few amino acids from chemicals, amid a continuous small sparking
apparatus, newspaper headlines proclaimed: "Life has been created!" But evolutionists hid the truth:
The experiment had disproved the possibility that evolution could occur.
The amino acids were totally dead, and the experiment only proved that a synthetic production of
them would result in equal amounts of left- and right-handed amino acids. Since only left-handed ones
exist in animals, accidental production could never produce a living creature (R. Milner, Encyclopedia
of Evolution, 1990, p. 274).
No Chance of Life by Chance
By Bruce Malone
www.SearchForTheTruth.org