I am writing in response about the controversial human footprints at the Paluxy river bed. I think it is interesting that in studying both the supposed human footprints and the supposed dinosaur footprints (and I have seen them) that many of the dinosaur footprints don't look like dinosaur footprints at all, they just look like impressions in the rock, but they are never called into question. But when the footprints look like human footprints they always have to be either carved or they always have to be a dinosaur footprint that has eroded into a human like footprint. So the red flags go up everywhere.






















I understand that we need to be careful with our opinions and conclusions, but don't you think that we might be going a little over board in questioning the human footprints?

I also understand that if the evolutionists admit that these prints could be human, then the greatest fairytale (evolution) is bankrupt and all the evolutionists know it. This is why many evolutionists are guarding and desperately trying to scientifically reinterpret the data.

We have to remember according to the geologic column which is the Bible of the evolutionists dinosaurs died off 65 million years before man and so any evidence to upset this geologic column is going to be suppressed.


I was looking at some anti-creation websites www.bibleandscience.com/science/footprints.htm www.unmuseum.org/palx.htm http://paleo.cc/paluxy/ovrdino.htm and one thing that has become very real to me is that they are dogmatic, desperate and consumed with trying to convince the public that there are no human footprints with dinosaur footprints in the world.

Just because some prints have been carved does not mean all the prints have been carved. If you see a counterfeit dollar bill does not mean all dollar bills are counterfeit?

I have been told that there are supposed human footprints and dinosaur footprints together in Arizona and I think in Russia. I have heard that there are other places where human footprints can be found with dinosaur footprints.

If it is really true that if you follow the trackways of some of these supposed human footprints they eventually start looking like dinosaur prints then why don't they take a picture of it and put it on their websites so we can see it for ourselves. You can make up any story that you want. If these footprints at the Paluxy are not human then why don't these anti-creation sites document their findings. So far, I have seen no real documentation that would lead a reasonable thinker to conclude that they are something other then human.

I do feel sorry for Carl Baugh and sometimes I think that he might be a little mistreated. I know what it is like to be ganged up on and be misunderstood.

Conclusion

I do teach that the footprints at the Paluxy could be real but I teach my students to examine the evidence for themselves and I teach them both sides of the story. I do believe that there is a great spiritual warfare going on here. Because if it could be proven that those human prints are real then evolutionists and the heretic theistic evolutionists and progressive creationists would have to repent of their rebellion against God.

It is obvious that this track was not carved at all. It is common sense that when a person is walking in mud unshod, the mud will squeeze up between the toes like this print did. You can tell just by looking at it, that there is no evidence of carving on this print. Here is something else to think about, when a person is unshod running in mud sometimes when the person lifts his foot up there will be a vacuum so mud will be forced back into the print as the person lifts his foot from the mud, therefore an obscure print will be made.




























These prints that were made in the limestone had to solidify quick or they would have eroded away very fast. This gives strong evidence that there was a high concentration of minerals in the mud then what we find today in mud made by most flood waters.

This is a real laugh. Various groups are saying that these prints are actually dinosaur footprints that eroded into a human like footprints. This is what you call desperation to alter evidence based on a preconceived idea called evolution. This is a real laugh. Various groups are saying that these prints are actually dinosaur footprints that eroded into a human like footprints. This is what you call desperation to alter evidence based on a preconceived idea called evolution.

I am told by various evolutionists that these pictures are prints left by dinosaurs. I ask, what prints? They have more faith then I do. Now I see why I don't believe in the literal interpretation of Darwinism.

But heaven forbid that I ever believe that these prints in this picture below crossing over the dinosaur prints might be human. O, no they have to be dinosaur prints that eroded into human like footprints. The bigger prints are not in question by the evolutionists.

Here is the bottom line. The evolutionists cannot accept the idea that there are human footprints with dinosaur footprints. If they ever admitted to that, it would destroy the evolutionist time table called the geologic column. Evolution would be called into question. Evolutionist do not have the honesty, dignity and integrity to alter their theory based on the evidence. Instead they have to explain away any evidence that might call evolution into question. Sometimes that means ignoring good scientific evidence just because it happens to agree with a book called the Bible. This proves that evolutionists are extremely biased. Whereas if there were no human footprints with dinosaur footprints found in the world that still would not prove that dinosaurs lived 65 million of years before man. So lets just say that those supposed human footprints are not really human footprints at all, that's fine. If that is really true, we as true scientists can accept that fact and move on. It does not hurt science that dinosaurs lived with man. We can accept that evidence without altering the evidence. We have plenty of of other evidence to accept the fact that dinosaurs did live with man. Will evolution ever evolve?